Watch live: Rachel Reeves delivers the Autumn Budget
Households have been sent a £356 warning for 2025 as people on many incomes could see wages fall.
It comes as experts warn incomes are set to stall or even fall in 2025 – although it is hoped there will be improvements in public services, according to a new study.
The Budget imposed a raft of new taxes, coupled with increases in borrowing, under a promises to boost growth, living standards and public services, chiefly the NHS.
A new study by a think-tank with close ties to Labour suggests that people will see little benefit in terms of cash through the next 12 months, but there are other lifestyle improvements on the cards.
The outlook comes from the Resolution Foundation which has calculated a new measure of “real living standards” that takes into account both disposable income and the “in-kind” benefits of public services.
This found the year ahead looks better for those at the bottom end of the income scale while the wealthiest will lose out.
READ MORE Panic-selling as hated tax hits new record after Rachel Reeves Budget
The Foundation estimates that the worst-off 10 percent of people of working age could see a 2 percent decline in their disposable income, but that would, they claim, be offset by improvements in public services where they would be £28 better off overall.
For the top half of earners, there was likely to be a 0.4 percent, or £140, fall in living standards once public service improvements were taken into account.
And the richest 10 percent of households would suffer a combined hit of £356 under the new measure.
The Foundation’s interim chief executive, Mike Brewer, said the “budget tax-rise gamble” from the chancellor was that “while people may not be better off in purely financial terms, they will feel better off if we can have better, less dysfunctional public services”.
The poorest households are hit hard by rising housing costs and hikes in council tax, while also being affected by real-terms cuts to social security payments. However, they do benefit from increases in the minimum wage and public services.
By contrast, the richest households do not rely on public services and therefore do not see as much benefit from improvements, as much, and benefit less from rises in minimum wages.
Mr Brewer told the Guardian: “If we put a cash figure on the benefits in kind from public services, then the 0.6 percent real living standards fall for the richest 10th of households is equivalent to a cash hit of £356 per person next year.
“Despite the government’s new targets for rising disposable incomes in its plan for change, the living standards outlook for 2025 is hardly a cause for celebration: disposable income is likely to fall, and if households are to feel better off, then it will only be if they see the benefits from spending more on public services.”
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said there was a tough outlook for Reeves on growth, inflation and the spending review due late next spring. Carl Emmerson, a deputy director of the thinktank, said Reeves’s focus on investment was commendable and could deliver long-term benefits, but failure to deliver growth could be difficult.
Emmerson told the PA news agency: “The outlook is uncertain. [Reeves] might get lucky. It’s possible growth will exceed the OBR’s forecast, things could go very well. But, equally, she could get unlucky. And I guess we don’t have much of a sense of what she would do.
“If she got unlucky, where would that leave [Labour’s] commitment to be delivering growth? Not very well. And what would she be doing on the public finances, given she seems to be unkeen on coming back for more taxes?
“She’s not given herself huge wiggle room against her fiscal targets and while she topped up day-to-day spending a lot this year and next, from April 2026 onwards, the spending plans look pretty tight.”
The Budget imposed a raft of new taxes (Image: Getty)
The spending review, due in June, will also be tricky for the Treasury to navigate, with departments expected to find savings of 5% and lots of demands for extra spending to deal with pressure on public services.
Emmerson said: “The very big challenge is going to be that spending review, because [Reeves has] confirmed the allocations for the current year. She’s set the allocations for the coming year, but they’re the two years in which she topped the plans up, and things looked much more manageable.
“The period beyond that looks really quite difficult, and so the exercise of getting a spending review to stick, that the cabinet agrees to, isn’t going to be easy.
“You’ve got so many competing needs for more spending. And actually, that’s an area where the extra spending didn’t look particularly focused on growth. I’m not saying it was the wrong thing to do, but lots of money for the NHS, lots of money for climate change, lots of money for justice: you can make the case for that spending, but I don’t think it’s the most obvious areas of spending, if you’re only worrying about growth.”
Asked about the outlook for the economy, a Treasury spokesperson pointed to comments by Reeves, saying: “The challenge we face to fix our economy and properly fund our public finances after 15 years of neglect is huge.
“But this is only fuelling our fire to deliver for working people. The budget and our plan for change will deliver sustainable long-term growth, putting more money in people’s pockets through increased investment and relentless reform.”
